This Is What a News Cycle That Holds Sexual Predators Accountable Looks Like

Posted by

It’s been called the “Weinstein Effect,” a kind of reckoning or reordering of a culture that has long invested itself in the protection of men and their reputations at an incredibly high cost, paid overwhelmingly by women. But if the allegations of sexual harassment and assault seem like a watershed moment, then backlash to this moment is inevitable.

“Witch hunt” is the favorite terminology to describe the now daily—and historically new—cycle of predators being held publicly accountable for their actions. Woody Allen warned of a “witch hunt atmosphere” in October, an attitude that has been echoed by politicians and journalists. And it continues again in the inevitable piece you knew was coming—casting doubt on truthfulness of the claims, however subtly, because there are so many.

“Is a Hollywood Witch Hunt Brewing?” the headline of a recent Hollywood Reporter editorial asked. The piece, written by Stephen Galloway, clearly laid out both the objections and the warnings that have accumulated since long-simmering frustrations and anger spilled over post-Weinstein story. Me Too and the Shitty Media Men list were emblematic of that anger turned text turned action, but their methods made them inherently suspicious to some.

“I’m terrified that, in our righteous quest to do good, we’re sweeping up the innocent as well as the guilty,” Galloway wrote. “We’re accepting allegations in the place of solid proof. We’re conflating those guilty of more minor crimes with perpetrators of egregious and even criminal behavior.” Galloway seems convinced that the media—including, ostensibly, his own colleagues—have been swept up in the moment, so eager to report the newest allegation they are “stretching the limits of what’s acceptable to report, breaching the thick wall between gossip and fact.” Galloway worries about the innocent being swept up and worries too that journalists are too eager to over-inflate minor infractions (ostensibly anything that’s not criminal is not newsworthy) and pay too much attention to past behavior. In short, Galloway’s objection to the current state of reporting on allegations is simply that it isn’t held to the standards of old journalism and, without those standards, smug critics might see their delusions of “fake news” made real.
But that assumption makes the faulty jump that the current systems we have to report violence and harassment are perfect—that they listen to us when we are so bold as to come forward against a powerful predator. Our broader cultural approach to the epidemic of sexual assault and harassment is largely dismissive. Handwringing over journalism ethics doesn’t pause to consider that the current approach is not just deeply flawed, but inherently and heavily tilted toward the protection of powerful men. Meanwhile, the statistics loom large: one in six women will experience rape or attempted rape in her lifetime. One in 10 rape victims is male. And 75 percent of all sexual harassment incidents go unreported.
And with a news cycle like this, it’s easy to see why. It was the fundamental failure of those exact systems that reduced routine assault to “open secrets”—a move that has long protected abusers like Weinstein, and Kevin Spacey, and Toback. (Weinstein quite literally hired former Mossad operatives to intimidate his victims and journalists reporting the allegations against him.)
But dismissing allegations as witch hunts works in other insidious ways. It’s telling that powerful producers, influential publishers—men who have an enormous amount of cultural and professional capital—are so easily able to position themselves as victims simply because the power structures that protected them for so long have slightly shifted. To invoke the witch hunt narrative is to reaffirm that power rather than to grapple with the widespread abuses that have been dismissed or simply treated as the price of doing business.
It is also an insidious reminder that “allegations” is a term that immediately conjures up suspicion. It has been made to signify petty gossip that has little basis in truth; historically coded as the accusations of untrustworthy women.
Click HERE For The Full Article