Actor Mischa Barton has become the latest in the long line of victims of what is commonly known as ‘revenge porn’. Her ex-partner secretly filmed her engaged in sexual activity and has been touting the videos for sale. Bravely speaking out about her experiences, Mischa said “I came forward to fight this, not only for myself but for all the women out there. I want to protect them from the pain and humiliation that I have had to go through. No woman should have to go through this.”
Mischa’s lawyer Lisa Bloom also spoke on her behalf and said, ‘revenge pornography’ is a horrific crime: it’s a ‘form of sexual assault’. Mischa is not the first victim to think of her experiences as a form of sexual violence. YouTuber star Chrissy Chambers who also had sexual images of her taken and then distributed without her consent has demanded that perpetrators are held “accountable for sexual assault“. Hunger Games actor Jennifer Lawrence referred to the extensive distribution of her naked images following a hack of the iCloud as a “sex crime“.
And it’s not just celebrities who are victims. Keeley Richards-Shaw from North Yorkshire became a victim when her ex-boyfriend took and shared sexual images of her without her agreement. ‘How anyone can fail to see revenge porn as a sexual crime is beyond me‘, she said. Indeed, this is why the label ‘revenge porn’ is so problematic, with many now using the term #ImageBasedSexualAbuse.
Sexual violence is driven by power and control, with men believing that they have the right to sex, regardless of consent. Research has found that motives of perpetrators of sexual violence such as rape and sexual assault include: humiliation, grievances, and punishment, as well as entertainment recreation and sexual gratification. And most importantly, victims experience ‘revenge porn’ as a form of sexual assault.
So, revenge porn’ – or rather image-based sexual abuse – is a sexual offence. The harm comes from the fact that it is sexual images that are shared without consent; the images go viral because they are sexual. Non-sexual images would simply not have the same potency to cause harm; nor would thousands of others distribute these images. Sharing private sexual images without consent exploits an individuals’ sexual identity and infringes their sexual autonomy. The online abuse which accompanies distribution of private sexual images includes sexual threats (rape threats), as well as abusive comments about the victim’s appearance, body, sexuality and sexual agency. New research has shown how all different forms of image-based sexual abuse – including ‘revenge porn’, ‘upskirting’, sexual extortion, sexualised photoshopping – share common characteristics with other forms of sexual offending.
Click HERE For The Full Article 

Bring MySideKick To Your Campus!

Enter Your Email Below.

 

Copyright © 2018-2024 Every Two Minutes, Inc., Delaware Public Benefit Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

MySideKick® is a registered trademark of Every Two Minute, Inc. and is registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Pending.